Rehabilitation of Achilles and Patellar Tendons: High Load is Important
Achilles and patellar tendinopathy are common and difficult to treat. Up to 18% of runners may develop Achilles tendinopathy, i.e. approximately 1 in 5. Elite runners have it much worse, up to 50% may have Achilles tendinopathy. Elite and sub-elite jumpers (volleyball, basketball) also have an alarmingly high prevalence of patellar tendinopathy, about 40-50%. First line treatment usually involves eccentric training – success rates for this intervention range between 55-89% in the Achilles and 50-70% in the patellar. There are many potential reasons for the range in success rates, including different populations, study designs, and eccentric protocols.
In the multidisciplinary specialist tendon clinic in London where I work, we treat about 300 Achilles and 200 patellar tendons per year. Based on lessons learned from this clinic, some key basic science, and clinical research, I would like to present an argument for high load as one of the key components of a successful tendon rehabilitation program.
Achilles the warrior was akin to a high performance athlete. It is ironic that his heel was his ‘weakest link’ as undoubtedly it would have been key in allowing him to achieve his legendry warrior status, in the same way that the Achilles tendon was indispensable to Jonathan Edwards in setting his triple jump world record (18.29m) in 1995. The Achilles and patellar tendons act as very efficient springs during fast human movement. They absorb energy when they are stretched and when released, the energy enhances muscle power during the muscle shortening phase; increasing the efficiency of human movement. This so-called stretch-shortening cycle only occurs with faster movements, such as running and jumping, but also walking. The stretch-shortening cycle is a fantastic mechanism in regards to human movement and performance but it does have consequences. Stretch-shortening cycle activities lead to very high tendon loads and greater stimulus to tenocytes (tendon cells) than slow muscle contractions, increasing the potential for tendon overuse injury.
The magnitude of load that the Achilles and patellar tendons endure during fast (i.e. stretch-shortening cycle activities) is astonishing. The Achilles tendon sustains up to 8 times body weight during running whereas up to 10-15 times body weight is sustained by the patellar tendon during maximal jumping/landing and weightlifting. It is no surprise then, that we tend to see Achilles and patellar tendinopathy in groups of people who endure prolonged and/or intense periods of stretch-shortening cycle activity (basketball, volleyball, running, sprinting, etc). Achilles tendinopathy also commonly affects sedentary people whose only activity is walking. Walking is a stretch-shortening cycle activity involving Achilles loads of 2-3 times bodyweight and therefore, overweight people are prone to the same tendinopathy.
We have established that tendons sustain high loads in stretch shortening-cycle activity and that this may increase the risk of injury, but how does this influence rehabilitation? One of the key goals of rehabilitation should be to increase tendon stiffness, as this will increase the tendons ability to withstand repeated stretch-shortening cycle loading and overuse injury. What is the stimulus for increasing tendon stiffness? There is some evidence that tendon responds more to heavy rather than lighter rehabilitation loads. In a study published in 2005, Keitaro Kubo from Japan compared patellar tendon response when performing 6×15 second isometric contractions for 12 weeks in both 50 degrees and 100 degrees. The tendon moment arm and force was greater at 100 degrees and only at this angle did the tendon display an increase in stiffness – i.e. it became stronger!
There are many other studies that suggest an increase in tendon stiffness after slow, heavy resistance training. In 2008, Nele Mahieu from Belgium published a study investigating eccentric training with body weight in the Achilles tendon. Mahieu however, did not find an increase in tendon stiffness after 6 weeks. This research is mainly among people with normal tendons so we’re not able to draw any conclusions about tendinopathy patients. There does however, seem to be a clear suggestion that high load is probably more likely than bodyweight exercise to increase tendon stiffness.
After all, high load is exactly what Hakan Alfredson has advocated from the start. The title of his landmark 1998 publication on Achilles eccentric training was: ‘Heavy-load eccentric calf muscle training for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinosis.’ I have lectured to hundreds of physiotherapists in the UK about tendinopathy and my impression is that over time, the benefit of Alfredson’s eccentric training program has been attributed to the mode of contraction (i.e. eccentric) rather than the load. A study published in 2009 by Mads Kongsgaard and co-workers in Denmark, compared eccentric training and concentric-eccentric heavy slow resistance training (greater maximal load) and found no clinical difference between the groups at 12 months. The concentric-eccentric heavy slow resistance group was more satisfied – probably because they only had to perform the exercise 3x/week rather than 2x/day!! This clearly suggests that eccentric mode of contraction may not be necessary for a good clinical outcome among some groups, but this is a story for another post!
There is no doubt that some patients with Achilles and patellar tendinopathy respond to eccentric training with bodyweight. One thing we know about eccentric training without load is that it may lead to a more compliant and more flexible joint – this was shown in the study by Nele Mahieu discussed above. Perhaps when performing eccentric training with bodyweight, it is more of a muscle stretch than tendon specific intervention, and this may be sufficient for some patients (perhaps those that are very tight). I suspect in the future (when we have more evidence) we may sub-group our patients into groups who respond more to stretching vs heavy loading.
What about patients who are less active, older or overweight, do we still need to load these patients heavily? Obviously clinical discretion is important as weakness and/or pain may limit heavy loading in some groups.
In essence, there IS some evidence showing that slow, heavy loading is good for tendons – especially the big, strong power tendons of the lower limb. High load is not a panacea for tendinopathy, just in the same way that eccentric training is not, but it is something to consider with Achilles and patellar tendon patients.
References
Alfredson, H., Pietilä, T., Jonsson, P., Lorentzon, R. (1998) Heavy-Load Eccentric Calf Muscle Training For the Treatment of Chronic Achilles Tendinosis. 26, 360-366.
Kongsgaard, M., Kovanen, V., Aagaard, P., Doessing, S., Hansen, P., Laursen1, A., Kaldau, N., Kjaer, M., Magnusson, S. (2009). Corticosteroid injections, eccentric decline squat training and heavy slow resistance training in patellar tendinopathy, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 19(6):790-802.
Kubo, K., Ohgo, K., Takeishi, R., Yoshinaga, K., Tsunoda, N., Kanehisa, H., & Fukunaga, T. (2006). Effects of isometric training at different knee angles on the muscle-tendon complex in vivo. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 16, 159-167.
Mahieu, N., McNair, P., Cools, A., D’Ahaen, C., Vandermeulen, K. & Witvrouw, E. (2008). Effect of eccentric training on the plantar flexor muscle-tendon tissue properties. Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, 40, 117-123.






Comments
Great post. Submaximal training to heal tendonopathy!
Great post and contribution to the site. Are you familiar with the group in Copenhagen that Peter Magnusson is a part of?
Thanks for the comments.
Yes, I am collaborating with Henning Langberg on some research at the moment. He is in Peter Magnusson’s team. They are certainly the leading group in the world when it comes to volume and quality of tendinopathy research.
Excellent post. Very interesting, your work. Does the greater body of unpublished research that you are familiar with seem to be tipping the quantity of the load rather than the mode of muscle action as the predominant stimulus for tendinopathic remodeling, in general?
Thanks, Jonathan. There is already published work that is on normals suggesting tendon responds to high load (I have referenced some in the post). We are looking at this in normals and tendinopathic patients at the moment.
Figured you’d know them. I spent several years at NISMAT with Mal McHugh. Peter used to work at NISMAT too if I’m not mistaken. He has made several contributions to the field. If you are ever in NYC please reach out.
Cheers and Happy Holidays
I’m should be coming to NYC in June next year and and will hopefully visit NY sports med and delivery a tendinopathy training course and/or lecture.
Happy holidays!
Figured you’d know them. I spent several years at NISMAT with Mal McHugh. Peter used to work at NISMAT too if I’m not mistaken. He has made several contributions to the field. If you are ever in NYC please reach out. Cheers and Happy Holidays
Excellent post. Very interesting, your work. Does the greater body of unpublished research that you are familiar with seem to be tipping the quantity of the load rather than the mode of muscle action as the predominant stimulus for tendinopathic remodeling, in general?
Hi Peter,
Great post! Its great to see that research in this area is still evolving.
Ben